Many evolutionary transitions are elegantly documented by more or less continuous series of gradually changing intermediate fossils. Some are not, and these are the famous ‘gaps’. Michael…… Read more “Richard Dawkins: It’s illogical to demand scientific evidence for scientific claims”
Category: atheism
“Poor Midianites”? Why Dawkins’s evaluation of their slaughter in the Old Testament is half-baked
It’s a common tactic to see skeptics point to the slaughtering of nations while overlooking the nations’ immorality and the divine justice against them.
Does God’s Word contradict? Come find out on Doctrine Sunday, January 7th
Come see what we’ve been covering…and what we’re doing next.
The Illusion of Design: Dawkins’ anti-naturalist argument
Dawkins: “It looks designed, but it’s an illusion. You think it’s designed, but you’re deluded. As if my book, The God Delusion, isn’t a dead giveaway…”
“Who Designed the Designer?”: the mixing categories fallacy
If “who baked the baker,” “who cooked the cook,” or “who wrote the writer” aren’t valid questions, then Dawkins’s question about the Designer is seriously illogical.
A Believing Atheist: The Speculative Dawkins Theory of the Origin of Life
Liquid water is a necessary condition for life as we know it, but it is far from sufficient. Life still has to originate in the water, and…… Read more “A Believing Atheist: The Speculative Dawkins Theory of the Origin of Life”
Divine Creation is No Magic Trick: The error of the Dawkins analogy
Richard Dawkins has confused the origin of life, which no man has seen, with magic tricks that are observable and repeatable. Sounds like a mixing of categories to me.
Design, Chance, and Darwinian Evolution: Is there Room for a Third Option?
Dawkins says that random chance and intelligent design aren’t opposites. The lengths some will travel to make way for an origin of life sans the Creator God is remarkable.
God as infinite regress: Darwinian evolution and the “designer God” argument
Placing God in infinite regress isn’t as easy for an evolutionist as it sounds.
Literalists need not worry: reconciling Jesus genealogies in Matthew and Luke
But there are many unsophisticated Christians out there who think it absolutely is necessarily so — who take the Bible very seriously indeed as a literal and…… Read more “Literalists need not worry: reconciling Jesus genealogies in Matthew and Luke”
essentialchurch.net 